Dr. Sarajane Eisen is a leading researcher on Evidence-based Art. Recently I interviewed her by email:
What changes have you seen with the use of art in healthcare over the last ten years?
There is a heightened awareness of the need for art in hospitals. The word is out about the positive psychological benefits of art in healthcare environments.
What about the kind of art that is displayed? How has that changed?
Nature art is widely accepted as being the most appropriate for healthcare. However, despite all the research there are still those who debate abstract vs. nature art.
What other changes have you seen?
There is a greater use of professional Art consultants to specify and provide art.
What is the key thing that research has revealed about art in healthcare in the last decade?
Research has revealed the important role art plays in contributing to a supportive environment, which in turn contributes to stress reduction and the healing process.
What are the key topics that you feel need to be addressed in the next decade?
Research of art in a variety of healthcare environments where little or no research has been conducted For example psychiatric treatment/recovery centers like the VA hospitals. They are undergoing major renovations with large amount of dollars being invested - yet there is not a single published research study
What mistakes do you see when people try to use evidence-based art to help with their art selection for hospitals?
People must be cognizant of the various factors factors affecting art selection, based on the EBD recommendations. 'One size does not fit all.'
Many factors play into the appropriate art selection: culture, gender, age, ethnicity. Individuals need to understand the guidelines that research has generated for art selection, but beyond that they need to understand that art images must be appropriately selected for specific healthcare space art images. What works well in a lobby/reception area is not necessarily appropriate for a patient room or an MRI room.
Is there anything else you would like to say?
Research is an on-going, information-generating process, not conclusive. We, as researchers in healthcare environments, are continually seeking new insights to better inform designers and decision-makers to assist them in making the very best design decisions that can positively impact both patients an their caregivers. There is still so much that needs to be researched - some totally unaddressed and some areas more in-depth. Areas such as color and art, themes and art, special patient populations and art. So it continues to be quite an exciting field of research and discovery.
Some of Dr. Eisen's articles on Evidence-based Design:
Eisen, S. L., Nanda, U., & Zanah, R. (2010). Effect of art on patient anxiety in a psychiatric
holding unit and implications for the business case. The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Leeds, England.
Eisen, S. L., & Parker, F. M. (2010). Comparing centralized vs. centralized nursing unit design as a determinant of stress and job satisfaction, in review..
Eisen, S. (2010). Art in pediatric healthcare environments, book chapter contribution,
Design Details for Health, 2nd edition., Leibrock, C. & Harris D., authors, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, in publication.
Eisen, S..L., (2008).The healing effects of art: in pediatric healthcare, The Journal for Child HealthCare, London, England.
Nanda, U., Eisen, S. L., & Baladandayuthapani, V. (2008). Undertaking an art survey to compare patients vs. design student art preferences, Environment & Behavior, New York.
-----------------------
Dr. Eisin earned her PhD from Texas A&M University and now works as Assistant professor at Txas Christian University. She serves on the board of AAHID and is EDAC certified.
Recent Comments